Loaded on
May 6, 2015
published in Prison Legal News
May, 2015, page 40
New Jersey, Ohio DOCs Significantly Reduce Phone Rates
According to an April 9, 2015 press release issued by New Jersey Advocates for Immigrant Detainees, LatinoJustice PRLDEF and the New York University School of Law Immigrant Rights Clinic, the New Jersey Department of Corrections (DOC) has resolved a contract dispute involving its phone service provider. As a result, phone rates in New Jersey prisons are expected to drop to under $.05 per minute starting by August 2015.
Further, while the DOC had stopped accepting commission kickback payments from prison phone companies in 2014, county jails that signed onto the DOC’s phone contract continued to receive commissions of up to 56%. As a result, some jails charged $8.50 for a 15-minute in-state call. Under the DOC’s new phone contract, counties that join the contract can no longer receive kickbacks and must charge the lower rates.
Following an order by the Federal Communications Commission that capped interstate prison phone rates in February 2014, the New Jersey DOC reduced its rates – first to $.19 per minute, then to $.17, $.15 and finally to $.13 per minute in January 2015.
Under the new contract with Global Tel*Link (GTL), the phone rates will reportedly drop ...
California Prisoner’s Conviction for Smuggling Tobacco Overturned
by Lonnie Burton
A California state prisoner convicted of a felony offense for smuggling tobacco into prison has had his conviction reversed by a California appellate court, although a related conviction for smuggling cell phones was affirmed.
In September 2011, Sherman Redd, incarcerated at Avenal State Prison, was the subject of an anonymous tip that claimed he had asked staff member Alcadio Cornil to smuggle in cell phones and tobacco. When Cornil arrived for work the next day he was met by two prison investigators. Asked to empty his pockets, he immediately responded, “I give up. I surrender.”
Cornil then produced bundles that contained four cell phones, two “tennis -ball sized” packages of tobacco and several cell phone chargers, two earbuds, four cables for the cell phones, an HDMI cable and a micro SD adaptor.
When questioned, Cornil admitted that he had been paid $1,200 to deliver the items to Redd, who worked for Cornil in the prison’s kitchen. Both Cornil and Redd were charged with felony offenses. Cornil pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to communicate with a prisoner without permission and one count of bribery, and received a two-year sentence. ...
Screening Out Family Time: The For-Profit Video Visitation Industry in Prisons and Jails
by Bernadette Rabuy and Peter Wagner
Every Thursday, Lisa* logs on to her computer and spends $10 to chat for half an hour via video with her sister who is incarcerated in another state. Before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) capped the cost of interstate calls from prisons, these video chats were even cheaper than the telephone. Lisa’s experience is representative of the promise of video visitation.
Meanwhile, Mary* flies across the country to visit her brother who is being held in a Texas jail. She drives her rental car to the jail but rather than visit her brother in-person or through-the-glass, she is only allowed to speak with him for 20 minutes through a computer screen.
How do video visits work? While video visitation systems vary, a visitor typically makes an appointment and pays any visit charges in advance. The person who is incarcerated is told to be at a certain video terminal at a certain time. The visitor then either drives to the facility to sit at a terminal or uses their personal computer to access the video visitation system over the Internet. Once both ...
Dialing with Dollars: How County Jails Profit From Immigrant Detainees
County jails charge excessive rates for phone usage – a huge barrier for immigrant detainees fighting deportation.
by Leticia Miranda
Arali was at home with her three-year-old son, Jose, when she got a call from Suffolk County Jail, a correctional facility about half an hour from her apartment in Framingham, Massachusetts. Her husband, Milton, was on the other end of the line. In tears, Milton explained to her that he had been detained after being in a car that was pulled over for a minor traffic violation.
Both Milton and Arali are undocumented immigrants from Guatemala. Milton migrated to the United States at twenty-one years old in 2005 following a hurricane that devastated his farm and much of Guatemala’s highland region, leaving him without a source of income to support his two children. Since then, Milton’s family back in Guatemala has been overwhelmed by the drug and gang-related violence that has ravaged the country over the last three decades. Drug traffickers recently killed Milton’s cousin. For Milton, deportation could mean risking death.
Milton, who prefers to use only his first name because of his open immigration case, was carpooling with ...
Loaded on
Dec. 3, 2014
published in Prison Legal News
December, 2014, page 24
Los Angeles County Jail Exploits Prisoners, Families with High Phone Costs
by Derek Gilna
Officials with Los Angeles County’s jail system have been criticized by County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky for exploiting prisoners and their families by charging excessive phone rates. “Everyone’s making a lot of money at the expense of inmates’ families,” Yaroslavsky said.
Prisoners’ rights advocates, including Prison Legal News, have cast a spotlight on exorbitant prison and jail phone costs for years, but reform has come much too slowly. [See: PLN, Dec. 2013, p.1; April 2011, p.1]. Meanwhile, county sheriff’s offices around the country have long enjoyed a steady revenue stream from inflated jail phone rates, including L.A. County.
According to a September 8, 2014 news report, under its current contract with phone service provider Global Tel*Link, the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department receives 67.5% of the revenue generated from jail phone calls in “commission” kickbacks, with guaranteed minimum annual payments of $15 million. Global Tel, an Alabama-based company, provides the county’s jail system with about 5,000 pay phones.
One prisoner’s mother, Kim Iannone, said that after her son was arrested she received an automated call from the company requiring her to set up a prepaid account ...
Loaded on
Oct. 10, 2014
published in Prison Legal News
October, 2014, page 34
Jail Video Visitation Proposal Considered in Dallas County, Texa
On September 9, 2014, the Dallas County Commissioners Court unanimously rejected a proposal that would have ended all face-to-face visits with prisoners at the Dallas County Jail. The Commissioners Court had been considering bids to equip the jail with a video visitation system. Prison phone service provider Securus Technologies appeared to have the edge on the contract; however, when the company submitted a plan that included the elimination of in-person visits at the jail, it met vigorous opposition from County Judge Clay Jenkins.
Judge Jenkins’ outspoken rejection of the plan was a rallying cry for a number of prisoners’ rights advocates, including Texas CURE, former state Rep. Terri Hodge and Richard Miles, a former Texas prisoner who was exonerated following a wrongful murder conviction. The Commissioners Court also received hundreds of emails and a petition with over 2,000 signatures objecting to Securus’ video visitation plan.
The company’s proposal included charging $10 for each 20-minute visit, and tried to sweeten the deal by offering the county a 25% commission on video visitation revenue. The Commissioners Court initially decided to table the issue and allow previous bidders to submit new bids based on ...
Prison and Jail Phone Reforms Needed in New Jersey
by Karina Wilkinson
Two prison phone service providers, Global Tel*Link and Securus, continue to overcharge prisoners and their families for calls made from prisons and jails in New Jersey. While federal regulations capped interstate (long distance) calls from correctional facilities beginning in February 2014, the State of New Jersey has allowed a grave injustice to continue by permitting companies to charge high rates and allowing county jails to accept commissions on in-state calls ranging from 50% to 70%. Such commissions amount to legal “kickbacks” that let phone companies share profits with state and local governments at the expense of those who can least afford it.
Prior to the Federal Communication Commission’s order capping interstate phone rates, charges of $.33 per minute from New Jersey state prisons and as high as $15.00 for 15-minute calls from county jails have translated to hundreds and even thousands of dollars of debt for prisoners and their families. New Jersey Advocates for Immigrant Detainees* and other advocacy groups have received reports of parents forgoing calls with their children because they couldn’t afford the cost.
“It is absolutely obscene that a private vendor can charge fees that ...
Loaded on
July 10, 2014
published in Prison Legal News
July, 2014, page 52
SEC Rejects CCA, GEO Group Shareholder Resolutions to Reduce Prison Phone Rates
On February 18, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) granted a request filed by for-profit prison company GEO Group to exclude a shareholder resolution that sought to reduce the high cost of phone calls made by prisoners at GEO-operated facilities. Ten days later, the SEC granted a request by Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) to exclude a similar shareholder resolution.
The resolutions, filed by Alex Friedmann, managing editor of PLN and associate director of the Human Rights Defense Center (HRDC), would have required the companies to forgo “commission” kickbacks from prison phone service providers. [See: PLN, Jan. 2014, p.44]. Such kickbacks are typically based on a percentage of revenue generated from inmate telephone services (ITS) – revenue that is mostly paid by prisoners’ families.
Specifically, the shareholder resolutions stated that GEO and CCA “shall not accept ITS commissions” at their facilities, and that when the companies contract with prison phone service providers they “shall give the greatest consideration to the overall lowest ITS phone charges among the factors [they consider] when evaluating and entering into ITS contracts.” CCA and GEO both filed no-action requests with the SEC ...
Loaded on
July 9, 2014
published in Prison Legal News
July, 2014, page 26
Louisiana Public Service Commission Considers Prison Phone Issues
The Advocate reported in March 2014 that tensions were high between Louisiana Public Service Commission (PSC) Chairman Eric Skrmetta and PSC Commissioner Foster Campbell during a hearing on issues related to prison and jail phone rates.
Previously, in December 2012, the PSC voted to lower the cost of phone calls made by Louisiana prisoners by cutting the rates of some calls by 25% and prohibiting surcharges. The ban on surcharges went into effect on February 28, 2013, while the rate reduction – which only applies to calls made to family members, clergy, attorneys and certain other parties – was postponed until 2014. [See: PLN, April 2013, p.29; Jan. 2013, p.14; Feb. 2012, p.36].
Two prison phone service providers, City Tele-Coin and Securus Technologies (which also has the phone contract for Louisiana’s state prison system), were subsequently cited by the PSC for contempt for charging additional fees in spite of the prohibition on surcharges.
Commissioner Campbell had championed the prison phone reforms, including the 25% rate reduction. City Tele-Coin and Securus have since petitioned the PSC to rescind the rate cut and ban on surcharges.
Additionally, City Tele-Coin hosted a fundraiser for PSC ...
Loaded on
May 19, 2014
published in Prison Legal News
May, 2014, page 26
Pay Tel Receives Waiver of Prison Phone Rate Caps
On January 8, 2014, Pay Tel Communications, a North Carolina company that provides phone services at correctional facilities in 13 states, filed a petition requesting a waiver of the rate caps on interstate (long distance) prison phone calls imposed by the Federal Communications Commission. The rate caps went into effect on February 11, 2014. [See: PLN, Feb. 2014, p.10].
As a result of longstanding efforts by prisoners, their family members and advocacy organizations (including the Campaign for Prison Phone Justice) against exorbitant prison and jail phone rates, the FCC ordered the rate caps and other reforms after examining the issue for almost a decade in a proceeding known as the Wright petition. The rate caps include a maximum of $.25 per minute for collect interstate calls and $.21 per minute for debit or prepaid interstate calls. [See: PLN, Dec. 2013, p.1].
The FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau found that Pay Tel had “met its burden of proof to establish a good cause to grant a limited, temporary waiver of the Commission’s interim [prison phone] rate cap rule.” Accordingly, on February 11, 2014, Pay Tel received a nine-month “narrow waiver” ...