Securus Technologies v. FCC, DC, Petition for Review, Prison Phone Rates, 2013
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS &Return FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU1T ~OV 142013 I RECEIVED _ BEFORE THE ITED STATES COURT OF APPEA S '"-_ _ _ _ _ _~~HE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C A{1£ NOV 1:42013 CLERK SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner, v. 1'3~-12aD No. 13-_ __ FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW Securus Technologies, Inc. ("Securus"), through counsel and pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 402, 28 U.S.C. § 2344, Fed. R. App. P. 15(a), and Circuit Rule 15, files this Petition for Review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") titled Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services, WC Docket No. 12-375, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 13-113, released September 26,2013 ("Inmate Rate Order"). This order was published on November 14,2013, at 78 Fed. Reg. 67956. A true and correct copy of that order is provided herewith. Specifically, Securus seeks review ofthe findings, conclusions, rates, and rules contained in the Inmate Rate Order pending the Court's substantive review, specifically Paragraphs 1 through 127, Paragraphs 187 through 189, and Rules 64.6000 through 64.6060. These portions of the Inmate Rate Order should be vacated, set aside, and held unlawful on the ground that they are: (a) "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law;" (b) "contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; .. (c) "in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right;" and (d) "without observance of procedure required by law." 5 U.S.C. § 706(2). Venue in this Court is appropriate pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 402(b). Securus shall move to stay the Inmate Rate Order pending this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 18 after the agency resolves the Petition for Stay that Securus filed October 22, 2013, with a requested decision date of November 21,2013. Dated: November 14,2013 Respectfully submitted, BY: ~ ~ Stepha' . oyce G. David Carter Arent Fox LLP 1717 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone 202.857.6081 Facsimile 202.857.6395 Stephanie.Joyce@arentfox.com David. Carter@arentfox.com Counsel for Securus Technologies, Inc. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this 14th day of November, 2013, that the foregoing Petition for Review, with the order presented for review, was served by hand on the following persons: Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20054 Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. Solicitor General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 By: Arent Fox LLP 11/13/13 Remittance Advice 126737 INVOICE NUMBER DATE 11/13/2013 3208 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 13NOV13 GIL AND MATIER# DESCRIPTION AMOUNT INVOICE TOTAL PETITION FOR REVIEW FILING FEE 450.00 TOTAL: $450.00 15·3 Arent Fox LLP PNC Bank. N./\, AlTORNEYS AT LAW 12q737 O~O I ," Was~lnglon. DC 17.17 K Slrelrt. NW WaS~'I)IIlOQ, O.C 26P36053~2 DATE Nov.' 132013 $****450.00 NETAMbl:JNT PA Y 540 , FODR HUNDRED .FIFTY AND ,00/100 Arent Fox LLP AM0I!JNTS OVER $10.000 REOUIRE 2 SIGNATURES I ' .'. PAY TOT,HE ORDER' OF ' CL~RK) U.S. COURT 'OF APPEALS ·E. BARREIT PRETTYMAN US COURTHOUSE I 333 CONST:ITtITfON AVE NW WAsmN'O'FON, DC 2 0001-2866 OJ III • 2 b 7 :l 7111 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE SECURITV FEATURES INCLUDED. DETAII.S ON BACK. I: 0 5 L. 0 0 0 0 :l 0 I: OJ _______________ 5 5 5 '1 7 b :l '1 :l :lUI