Skip navigation

McGill v. Clements, PA, Complaint, Solitary for Dreadlocks, 2020

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ERIC S. MCGILL, JR.,

:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
TIMOTHY L. CLEMENTS,
:
Deputy Warden of Operations of Lebanon :
County Correctional Facility;
:
MICHAEL OTT, Captain of Security of
:
Lebanon County Correctional Facility;
:
ROBERT J. KARNES, Warden of Lebanon :
County Correctional Facility;
:
LEBANON COUNTY;
:
:
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1712
(SAPORITO, M.J.)
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

AMENDED COMPLAINT
Lebanon County Correctional Facility has held Plaintiff Eric S. McGill, Jr. in
solitary confinement for over a year solely because he refuses to cut off his
dreadlocks—an act which would violate his Rastafarian religious beliefs. Lebanon
County’s practice of punishing people who refuse to cut their dreadlocks, without
allowing for religious exemptions, violates Mr. McGill’s rights under the First and
Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and the Religious Land
Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1. Mr.
McGill, a pretrial detainee, brings this action for injunctive relief and damages
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
1
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 2 of 16

JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. §§

2201 and 2202, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act
(“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1.
2.

The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(a)(3).

3.

Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2)

because the events and omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in Lebanon
County, Pennsylvania, in the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
PARTIES
4.

Plaintiff Eric S. McGill, Jr. is an adult Black man currently incarcerated

at the Lebanon County Correctional Facility (“LCCF”) as a pretrial detainee.
5.

Defendant Lebanon County is a county of the fifth class in

Pennsylvania and operates LCCF, a county jail. Lebanon County and LCCF receive
federal financial assistance.
6.

Defendant Robert J. Karnes is the Warden of LCCF. He is the chief

executive officer of LCCF, approves all LCCF policies, and is the jail’s final
policymaking authority. He is responsible for the oversight, operation and
administration of the LCCF. He is sued in his individual and official capacities.

2
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 3 of 16

7.

Defendant Michael Ott is employed as the Captain of Security at LCCF.

He is the highest-ranking uniformed officer at LCCF and reviews all of the jail’s
policies and procedures. He is sued in his individual and official capacities.
8.

Defendant Timothy L. Clements is employed as the Deputy Warden of

Operations at LCCF. His responsibilities include reviewing placements in
administrative segregation. He is sued in his individual and official capacities.
9.

All Defendants were acting under color of state law at all relevant times.
FACTS

Mr. McGill’s Dreadlocks and Religious Beliefs
10.

Mr. McGill is an adherent of the Rastafari religion, or Rastafarianism.

11.

Rastafari is an Afrocentric religion that developed in Jamaica in the

1930s.
12.

Rastafari has adherents throughout the world. Most Rastafarians are of

Black African descent.
13.

Mr. McGill wears his hair in dreadlocks and has done so for

approximately seven years.
14.

Dreadlocks is a manner of wearing hair that is common for Black

people and suitable for Black hair textures.
15.

Dreadlocks form naturally, without any manipulation, in some Black

people’s hair.
3
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 4 of 16

16.

Once hair has naturally formed dreadlocks, it cannot be taken out of

dreadlocks; the only way to “remove” natural dreadlocks is to cut them off.
17.

Rastafarians view dreadlocks as a symbol of strength, and keeping their

hair in dreadlocks is an important part of the Rastafarian way of life for many
adherents.
18.

The importance of dreadlocks for Rastafarians stems in part from the

“nazirite vow” taken by Samson in the Bible, which requires that adherents avoid
cutting their hair.
19.

Pursuant to his Rastafarian faith, Mr. McGill keeps his hair in

dreadlocks.
20.

Mr. McGill believes that his spirit lives through his dreadlocks.

21.

Mr. McGill also believes that his dreadlocks keep him spiritually pure,

a requisite for entry into the afterlife.
22.

For Mr. McGill, cutting off his dreadlocks would be akin to cutting off

his strength and his spirit.
23.

Mr. McGill was previously incarcerated in a state prison operated by

the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and, while there, he was permitted to
keep his hair in dreadlocks, without any punishment or other consequences.

4
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 5 of 16

LCCF’s Prohibition of Dreadlocks
24.

LCCF’s Rules and Regulations allow long hair as long as it is tied up

or worn in a single pony tail.
25.

The Rules and Regulations prohibit people incarcerated at LCCF from

wearing their hair in braids or cornrows, two hairstyles that are frequently worn by
Black people.
26.

The Rules and Regulations given to Mr. McGill and other people at

LCCF do not prohibit dreadlocks, as dreadlocks are not a form of braids.
27.

Nonetheless, Defendants have a policy, custom, and practice of

punishing people who refuse to cut their dreadlocks by housing them in the Security
Housing Unit (“SHU”), a form of solitary confinement.
28.

According to Defendant Karnes, “[d]readlocks are considered to be

‘braids’ for purposes of application of LCCF policy.” See Affidavit of Robert J.
Karnes, ECF Doc. No. 18-1: Exhibit 1, ¶ 8.
29.

Defendant Ott, on the other hand, told Mr. McGill that “the issue of

dreadlocks was added after th[e] handbook was printed.”
30.

Defendant Karnes has stated that LCCF’s prohibition against braids,

cornrows, and dreadlocks is due to “inmates’ ability to hide contraband and to ensure
cleanliness in the correctional facility.” See Affidavit of Robert J. Karnes, ECF Doc.
No. 18-1: Exhibit 1, ¶ 8.
5
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 6 of 16

31.

Dreadlocks are not inherently any less clean than any other hairstyle,

and they can be kept as clean as hair styled any other way.
32.

Upon information and belief, LCCF’s hair policies are not a result of

any incidents involving LCCF prisoners hiding contraband in their hair or any other
security problems posed by prisoners with dreadlocks.
33.

Any potential risk of people hiding contraband in dreadlocks could

easily be addressed through the use of searches.
34.

LCCF does not provide for religious hair exemptions from its rule

against dreadlocks.
35.

Dozens of jail and prison systems across the United States, including

the United States Bureau of Prisons and the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
permit prisoners to have dreadlocks.
36.

During Mr. McGill’s incarceration at LCCF, there have been at least

two prisoners with dreadlocks at LCCF who were housed in general population
rather than in the SHU.
Mr. McGill’s Placement in Solitary Confinement
37.

Mr. McGill has been incarcerated at LCCF as a pretrial detainee since

January 19, 2019.
38.

Since his arrival at LCCF, Mr. McGill has been housed in the SHU.

6
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 7 of 16

39.

The sole reason for Mr. McGill’s placement in the SHU is his refusal

to cut off his dreadlocks. See Affidavit of Robert J. Karnes, ECF Doc. No. 18-1:
Exhibit 1, ¶ 14.
40.

Mr. McGill was not cited for violating any LCCF rules prior to his

placement in the SHU, and he did not have a misconduct hearing or any other
opportunity to formally contest his placement in the SHU.
41.

Nonetheless, Mr. McGill is being punished with indefinite solitary

confinement as a result of his refusal to conform to LCCF’s policy prohibiting
dreadlocks.
42.

Defendants consider Mr. McGill’s placement in the SHU to be a form

of “administrative segregation.”
43.

According to LCCF’s Rules and Regulations, a prisoner can only be

placed in administrative segregation at the discretion of the Warden or his designee.
44.

Defendants Karnes, Ott, and Clements have all approved of Mr.

McGill’s placement and continued housing in the SHU as punishment for his refusal
to cut off his dreadlocks.
45.

On February 2, 2019, Defendant Ott told Mr. McGill, in a written

response to an inmate request form, “If you take [your dreadlocks] out, you will be
taken off of Admin. Seg. If not you will remain.”

7
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 8 of 16

46.

Although LCCF permits prisoners to have long hair if it is tied up or

worn in a single ponytail, Defendants have kept Mr. McGill in the SHU despite his
offers to tie his hair up.
47.

As of the date of this Amended Complaint, Mr. McGill has been

confined in the SHU for 396 days, far longer than is typical in LCCF even for serious
misconduct violations.
48.

For example, according to LCCF’s Rules and Regulations, the

estimated sentences for intoxication, fighting, and threatening an employee with
bodily harm range from 30 to 120 days.
Conditions in the SHU
49.

Solitary confinement, known by many names, refers to the practice of

holding an incarcerated person in a cell between 22 and 24 hours per day, alone or
with a cellmate, isolated from normal social interaction with others, and subjected
to severe restrictions impacting every aspect of their lives.
50.

As recently noted by the Chief Judge of the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, “[r]esearchers have observed that
‘psychological stressors such as isolation can be as clinically distressing as physical
torture.’” Johnson v. Wetzel, 209 F. Supp. 3d 766, 779 (M.D. Pa. 2016) (quoting
Jeffrey L. Metzner, M.D., et al., Solitary Confinement and Mental Illness in U.S.

8
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 9 of 16

Prisons: A Challenge for Medical Ethics, 38 J. AM. ACAD. PSYCHIATRY & LAW 104,
104 (2010)).
51.

The United Nations has long recognized prolonged solitary

confinement, for any duration over 15 days, as a form of torture that is banned under
the Mandela Rules.
52.

The SHU at LCCF houses prisoners who are in “administrative

segregation” as well as those who are in “disciplinary confinement” as punishment
for violating prison rules.
53.

Mr. McGill is subject to all of the same restrictions as prisoners who

are in disciplinary confinement.
54.

In the SHU, Mr. McGill is given a maximum of one hour of recreation

five days per week.
55.

Recreation is outside except when it is raining or snowing. If Mr.

McGill chooses not to go outside, he is only given 20 minutes of indoor recreation.
56.

These recreation periods are provided between 12:00 A.M. and 2:00

A.M., at most five days a week.
57.

These are the only times Mr. McGill is permitted to use the phone,

which makes it extremely difficult for him to stay in touch with his family, given the
late hour.

9
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 10 of 16

58.

On Wednesdays and Thursdays, Mr. McGill is only allowed out of his

cell for five minutes a day.
59.

In general population, prisoners receive far more out-of-cell time and

the out of cell time occurs during daylight hours, allowing people to communicate
more easily with their family.
60.

In the SHU, the lights are kept on at all hours, with the exception of

10:00 P.M. – 12:00 A.M.; sometimes the lights are kept on 24 hours a day.
61.

Upon information and belief, in general population, the lights are turned

off at night.
62.

In the SHU, Mr. McGill eats all his meals in his cell, while general

population prisoners are permitted to eat one to two meals a day outside of their
cells.
63.

Mr. McGill is sometimes forced to eat in his cell when there is urine or

feces in his toilet that cannot be flushed, as the toilet locks from flushing for an hour
if it is flushed twice in five minutes.
64.

Mr. McGill is not permitted to receive books from outside the prison,

while prisoners in general population can have books shipped to them by friends and
family.

10
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 11 of 16

65.

Mr. McGill is only permitted to order certain hygiene and clothing

items from commissary; unlike prisoners in general population, he is not permitted
to order food from commissary.
66.

Mr. McGill is only permitted one visit per week, which can last a

maximum of 30 minutes, while prisoners in general population are permitted up to
three visits each week, each of which can last up to 150 minutes.
67.

As a result of these visiting restrictions, Mr. McGill has received far

fewer visits from his family—including his two infant children—than he would were
he in general population.
68.

Unlike prisoners in general population, Mr. McGill is not permitted to

receive photographs in the mail.
69.

The SHU is much dirtier than general population, as SHU prisoners are

not given equipment and materials with which to clean their cells. Instead, staff clean
the SHU cells once a month.
70.

The corridor outside the SHU cells is also much dirtier than general

population, as SHU prisoners are instructed to put their trash, including their food
waste, in the hallway, where it stays until inmate workers come and pick it up.

11
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 12 of 16

Mr. McGill’s Deteriorating Mental Health
71.

As a result of his time in solitary confinement, Mr. McGill has been

suffering from worsening depression, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) and
anxiety attacks.
72.

Mr. McGill has experienced anxiety attacks about two to three times a

week throughout most of his time in solitary confinement at LCCF.
73.

When Mr. McGill has an anxiety attack, his heart races, he feels dizzy,

and he breaks out in a sweat.
74.

His anxiety attacks usually begin when he thinks about the conditions

of and the reasons for his placement in solitary confinement.
75.

Mr. McGill was prescribed Trazodone, an anti-depressant drug that is

also used to treat anxiety and insomnia, at LCCF, but he continued to have anxiety
attacks.
76.

Mr. McGill was also prescribed another anti-depressant drug, Zoloft,

while at LCCF.
77.

In late January 2020, he was switched from Trazodone to Remeron,

another anti-depressant drug, which he was told would help him sleep better at night.
78.

Mr. McGill had a diagnosis of PTSD prior to his incarceration at LCCF,

and it has been exacerbated by his lengthy stay in solitary confinement.

12
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 13 of 16

CAUSES OF ACTION
Count I: Violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1
(against all individual Defendants in their official capacities and Defendant
Lebanon County)
79.

Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in each of the preceding

paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
80.

By requiring that Mr. McGill either remain in solitary confinement or

cut off his dreadlocks, Defendants have imposed a substantial burden on Mr.
McGill’s practice of his Rastafarian religious beliefs.
81.

Defendants’ requirement that Mr. McGill remain in solitary

confinement if he does not cut off his dreadlocks is not the least restrictive means of
furthering any compelling government interest.
Count 2: Deprivation of First Amendment Right to Free Exercise of
Religion
(against all Defendants)
82.

Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in each of the preceding

paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
83.

By keeping Mr. McGill in solitary confinement because he refuses to

cut off his dreadlocks, Defendants have inhibited his right to free exercise of religion
for no legitimate penological purpose.

13
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 14 of 16

Count 3: Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment:
Substantive Due Process
(against all Defendants)
84.

Plaintiff incorporates the allegations contained in each of the preceding

paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
85.

As a pretrial detainee, Mr. McGill has a right to be free from

punishment.
86.

The individual Defendants have chosen to keep Mr. McGill in solitary

confinement in order to punish him.
87.

Defendants’ policy and custom of requiring Mr. McGill to either cut off

his dreadlocks or remain in solitary confinement is not rationally related to any
legitimate non-punitive government purpose.
88.

To the extent Defendants’ treatment of Mr. McGill bears some rational

relationship to a legitimate non-punitive government purpose, it is excessive in light
of that purpose.
RELIEF DEMANDED
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Eric S. McGill, Jr. respectfully requests that the
Court grant the following relief:
A.

A declaratory judgment that Defendants violated Mr. McGill’s rights

under RLUIPA, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments of
the United States Constitution;
14
 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 15 of 16

B.

An injunction requiring Defendants to immediately remove Mr. McGill

from the SHU and place him in general population, with all of the same freedoms
and privileges as other prisoners housed in general population at LCCF;
C.

An award of compensatory damages against all Defendants in an

amount to be determined by the finder of fact;
D.

An award of punitive damages against the individual Defendants in an

amount to be determined by the finder of fact;
E.

Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs; and

F.

Such other relief the Court deems just and proper.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Alexandra Morgan-Kurtz
Alexandra Morgan-Kurtz
Attorney I.D. # PA 312631
PA INSTITUTIONAL LAW PROJECT
100 Fifth Ave, Suite 900
Pittsburgh, Pa 15222
T: 412-434-6175
amorgan-kurtz@pailp.org

DATE: February 19, 2020

/s/ Matthew A. Feldman
Matthew A. Feldman
Attorney I.D. # PA 326273
PA INSTITUTIONAL LAW PROJECT
718 Arch Street, Suite 304S
Philadelphia, PA 19106
T: 215-925-2966
F: 215-925-5337
mfeldman@pailp.org
15

 

Case 3:19-cv-01712-JFS Document 30 Filed 02/20/20 Page 16 of 16